A Critique of Rung Fixation Within Contemporary Odontogriphus

As DuPlessis writes, “There are no genderless subjects in any relationship structuring literary culture: not in production, dissemination, or reception; not in objects, discourses, or practices; not in reading experiences or in interpretations.” As Quarles / Syntaxis "writes", There are no matterless, animalless, non-earth specific subjects in any relationship structuring literary culture: not in production, dissemination, or reception; not in objects, discourses, or practices; not in reading experiences or in interpretations. Furthermore, It is the fix-ed gaze upon any subsequent rung within the ladder of abstraction, whose being-dumb-in-dumb-being coordinates the political seduction which is the real subject of all criticism, instead of the punitive trajectories which are the reality of being-beyond-determination which paradoxically is the determination of being termed in the first place. Water, for instance, is easily more central to all forms of production, and arguably forms the first body politic of any contentions within collectivity. The universal stupidity of abstraction, in the face of a universal circumscribed to absolute uniqueness must, patently lead, only to collectivities formed on the basis of mass seductions inscribed by abstract stoppages, ie Politics as Oracular Halting (fate as a migrating state-plane traversing physicality's 'coesis'. The singularity of syntaxis is multi-species, but the singularity of this discussion entered the body as morphological politics long ago, ie, your mate may live within your bowells, for the time being. Disgust (discussed) = djinn-derrrr relotions. or, "Relax bitch, you, or I, or both of us could have had it much, much, worse." The Umwelt will remain a morphological gambit, and criticism will remain, a game for small minds.