Friday, November 12, 2010

Irrony 101. Placing Goldsmith into Lineages. Venn Is A (Pupal Bull #1)

We will put a suction device on its head (pen):

Text is already 'too close' to the conceptual.
The conceptual is already 'too close' to the subject [βίος](bios-life),
arguably, 'the text'.

The direct implication of any aesthetic activity deriving its content
from a supposed collapsing of the object of thought into a purely
suppositional notion of 'pure thought' which cannot be separated
from the subject is a fallacy. The subject is always the object
of thought, and thought is always contained in an object, the subject.
And since the subject IS an object, though an incredibly special and
precious object (see subject), the implication is one of a purely
sophistic Manicheanism.

The actual field of interest in such an easily deconstructed set of theoretical concerns
is style, and, in a sense, the poetic echo, or rhyme as created out of lived history.

Just to give a Vasiliakisian stare to the word Kosuth is to realize an irony
of socially mediated aesthetics, ie Sophism.


Joseph the Architect? Look again.The name Joseph comes from
the verb  (yasap 876) meaning to add, increase, do again.
Joseph would mean increaser, or doubler.

So, paradoxically, Vanessa Place is correct, or whoever.

If "Conceptual Writing" is an allegory, then the external aesthesis

is symbolic.

Symbolism is the basic currency of Allegory, but what is the story.

The story is, that the physical and conceptual are one, that we are no different from thoughts,
and that thought itself is physical, and the two are confused into a Co-Sooth

a Verity of Union, and if you note the term Place uses for her theory of image

Ventouse, this is an instrument for aiding birth.

The Image as Instrumentality. (But we are image.) (But we make images.) (But we make people.)

and, strangely.

Sophistry in the service of Truth?
Yes. Truth?

with a question mark.
Not because of one thing, but because of many things.

and thus, through the collapsing of Truth, A vacuum is produced.

That vacuum may seem like the Engine of Sophistry,
but it is the Engine of Syntaxis displayed as an Aesthetic Object, or

Non-Object. And this something equally non-new.

Luce Irigaray, in Elemental Passions for example has a long discussion
of "Open Non-Objects", which is more or less, 'thinking'..

So, As ancient man did by creating religion out of fetishizing thought,
So too, has modern woman, and man, "Joseph'ed" the "Co-Sooth"
or doubled the verity, but it's not very creative, and they tell you its

Uncreative, which it isn't. Uncreativity, like Asemia, are things which can be imagined
and illustrated, but which physically, are impossible.

Even a non-sign is a sign. It's a sign of non-signed-ness.

If these sad little contemporary theorists would just come ask me. heheh
I could help them. I have the knowledge.

And the knowledge, sadly, is just that, it's ALL IMAGES, even the thought, even the non-thought.

Oh, it's so funny.

Really. It's so funny what happened to humanity because of pictures.

Sad, really.

And to think,
if only we had fetishized

Y instead of $ (as 'is).. seeing image display as pure possibility
instead of the harness of "Tat Tvam Asi"..

Or is that, this, the Truth?


If we remove the R sound from Truth, we have Tooth.

A tooth or tusk just grows. It grows and has a shape.

Y or E said for And in Spanish

is a reliquary for this.

The Truth is a Tusk named "And"


and notice the three prongs
of Subjectivity, or M
for Meaning, that topology
of the string.

But where is the Hole?