Isn't it more to the point that any difference between languaged and imaged is itself a "game(te)" giving birth to the "misprisiom" at the foundation of normalizing expression aka the institutional discursivity central to socialization. Not that this isn't fundamentally an expediancy based on practical terms, but it also serves as an exotheoric boundary on both aesthesis and semiosis in general.. ie the lovely boundaries obscure the natural field.. etc